KiqIQ vs Footinsights

Footinsights does one thing well: a clean, free, AI-flavoured insights feed with a public stats archive showing every past pick. The tone is professional, and the price (zero) is hard to argue with. If your only need is a daily list of "the model thinks this team wins," Footinsights serves it well.

KiqIQ is a wider product. Predictions are inline on every fixture, but they sit alongside a recent head-to-head card, 38 free calculators that let you price any market yourself, live league standings with an xPoints column, the full FPL stack (captains, FDR, wildcard), a bet tracker with ROI and P&L (paid plans), and trap-game flags (paid plans). The whole stack is connected, clicking a fixture takes you to a real match-detail page, not a different site.

The other practical difference is methodology transparency. Footinsights describes a "self-learning AI" without naming the underlying methodology. KiqIQ documents its prediction stack on the methodology page: cross-bookmaker odds consensus stripped of the overround, Poisson scoreline grid from xG, baseline 45/27/28 home-advantage fallback when no odds are available. You can reproduce every number in the calculators yourself.

Where Footinsights genuinely wins: league breadth and a polished public track-record page. We're open about both, and we're shipping new leagues incrementally as our data partner's coverage grows. If raw league breadth is your single most-important factor and you don't need calculators or fantasy, Footinsights will cover you today.

And if you want both, many of our users keep Footinsights open for league breadth and KiqIQ open for the analysis tooling. They aren't mutually exclusive.